Conservative Party of Canada

Your MP at Work

I introduced Private Member’s Bill C-240 back in September, and it is now coming up for…

Facebook · April 19, 2026

I introduced Private Member’s Bill C-240 back in September, and it is now coming up for…Watch the video on Facebook
I introduced Private Member’s Bill C-240 back in September, and it is now coming up for debate on April 30. This bill reflects what we care about most, strengthening protections and improving outcomes for the people it is meant to support.
What Kelly says in this video

Automatic transcript; it may contain small errors.

Today I rise to introduce the Offender Rehabilitation Act, a bill that seeks to address one of the most urgent and heartbreaking crises facing Canadian families, the devastating impact of substance addiction. Canadians see the toll, lives are lost, families are shattered, and public safety is eroded. Our justice system must do more than punish, it must also heal. It empowers courts to prescribe structured rehabilitation measures, including education, skills training, and treatment programs. To be undertaken during custody, these are not soft on crime measures, they are smart on recovery interventions. The bill strengthens the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, ensuring that rehabilitation objectives are considered during parole decisions, and it amends the Controlled Drugs and Substance Act to treat large-scale fentanyl trafficking as an aggravating factor, reflecting the gravity of harm inflicted in our communities. I look forward to working with all members of this House to restore dignity, health, and hope to those caught in the cycles of addiction. Thank you.

More of Kelly's work

Facebook · April 18, 2026

My Private Member's Bill, C-240 is about breaking the cycle of repeat crime and focusing on recovery and accountaility. It's up for second reading soon. If you have questions about my bill, ask them in the comments and we'll answer them next week!

House of Commons · April 21, 2026

House of Commons: Routine Proceedings — Committees of the House — Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities

Mr. Speaker, there was a time in this country when a path was clear. If people worked hard, made good choices and invested in their future, they could get ahead. That was the Canadian dream. However, for a lot of Canadians today, that dream feels further and further out of reach.… Read more

Costs are up, opportunities feel tighter and more and more people are doing everything right, but still falling behind. At a moment like this, the role of the government should be simple: to make it easier for people to build a life, not harder. That is why this policy is so frustrating. Instead of opening doors, it is closing them. The government proposed restricting the Canada student grant for full-time students. It might sound like a small change, but in real life, it boils down to this. Two students can be working just as hard, striving to build their careers and trying to build a future in this country, but one of them gets the help while the other gets nothing just because of where they go to school. That is not fair. That is not common sense. That is not how we rebuild the Canadian dream. Those in Waterloo region are incredibly proud of their post-secondary institutions. There are institutions like Conestoga College, Wilfrid Laurier University and the University of Waterloo, but there are also great institutions like triOS College, which reached out to me personally, concerned about this change. These are colleges that serve our community that the traditional system does not work for, such as single moms working two jobs and still wanting to go to school or anyone who can attend classes outside of their nine to five regular work. These people are now questioning whether they can afford to stay in their programs. Students who are trying to become medical professional assistants, PSWs or IT professionals are now being told that the support they were counting on may not be there. These schools are helping shape our next generation. They give students options, different paths, timelines and ways to succeed, but the reality is that not every student follows the same path. Some students want a university education. Others want something more hands-on, something that gets them into the workforce faster. That is where career colleges come in. They train people for real jobs in real industries, often in less time. They prepare people to become personal support workers, medical assistants, IT professionals and skilled trade workers. These are not backup plans. These are essential jobs. These are the people we rely on every single day, and yet, under this policy, many of those students will lose access to federal grants, not because their work is less important or their career is not needed but because of the type of school they attend as the traditional path did not work for them. Let us think about that. We are telling people who want to work in health care, in the trades or tech that they picked the wrong path, so they are on their own now. At the same time, we have a labour shortage. We see all across our communities that there are just not enough workers. Therefore, why would we make it harder for people to get those skills? Why would we put up those financial barriers? That is what this does. It makes it harder for people to take that next step and for many, it will mean they simply cannot afford to go. It is worth asking who is most likely to be affected by this. It is not the students with the most resources. It is the ones trying to change their lives. People are going back to school later: new Canadians, people looking for a second chance or a fresh start. This policy does not hit everyone equally. It hits those who are climbing an uphill battle. Now let us talk about affordability, because this is where it hits the most. Most students do not have extra money sitting around. They rely on grants to make school possible. Rent is high, groceries are high and everything costs more. For some people trying to decide whether they can go back to school, change careers or learn a new skill, that support can make the difference between moving forward or staying back. The government removing that support for one group of students is a closed door that will hit those with lower and middle incomes. Canadians who are in these classes are hit the hardest, the very people who are trying to get ahead and break cycles in their own lives. There is another piece to this that matters, especially in a place like Kitchener. That is the extra pressure put on our post-secondary institutions. They contribute to our communities and support our local economies, but we have also seen the pressure on housing, infrastructure and services. Those challenges need to be addressed properly. The policy that the government is suggesting does not solve these problems. It does not fix housing or improve oversight. It does not strengthen the system. All it does is make life harder for Canadian students choosing career training. If anything, we should be expanding flexible, targeted training options to meet demand, not shrinking them. Career colleges are often the fastest way to respond to workforce needs. They adapt quickly and focus on specific skills. In moments like this, when the economy is shifting, that kind of flexibility is not a weakness but a strength. Provinces regulate these schools. They decide which institutions are legitimate and which programs meet standards. The committee made a simple recommendation. If a province says a school is valid, the federal government should respect that. That is the response that puts students first. Right now, the government has not explained why it is suggesting this change or what problem it is solving. From where Canadians are standing, it does not solve anything. It just creates new problems. It creates unfairness and barriers, and it sends the wrong message about the value of work. At the end of the day, it comes down to something simple: respect for students, respect for a different path and respect for the idea that there is more than one way to build a good life in this country. University is a great path. College is a great path. I went to college. Career training is also a great path. We need all of them. We should be supporting all of them, not telling one group they matter more than another. When we do that, we hurt our workforce and our economy, and we push the Canadian dream out of reach. The ask here is simple: reverse this, restore fairness and support students, no matter which path they choose, because if we are serious about helping Canadians get ahead, then we need to stop putting obstacles in the way.

Facebook · April 21, 2026

My Private Member’s Bill, C-240 is about breaking the cycle of repeat crime and giving real paths to recovery. It’s up for second reading on April 30. We need to move forward and get better outcomes for both communities and offenders.

Help Kelly keep working for Kitchener Centre

Kelly's work in Ottawa is backed by volunteers and supporters here at home. A monthly donation of any size keeps the local team going, and political contributions earn a generous federal tax credit.